Post by account_disabled on Dec 31, 2023 1:15:01 GMT -5
AAccording to the medicolegal certificate issued on July by the forensic medicine service the plaintiff had traumatic injuries that could have been caused by overuse of the interphalangeal joint and that could have dated from July . In addition the plaintiff was recommended to continue medical care between and days. C. Criminal procedure . On July the applicant filed a criminal complaint against CP for abusive behavior illegal deprivation of liberty and insult. On July the CP also filed a criminal complaint against the applicant for defamation and contempt of court.
The two complaints were submitted to the Prosecutors Office Country Email List attached to the Constana Court of Appeal the prosecutors office which on July decided to connect them. . On August the applicant gave a statement to the police he repeated his version of events. . On August SG gave in turn a statement to the police. He stated that CPs attitude was unpleasant that he prevented him from leaving the office and that he insisted that he sign a series of documents and that he answered the complainants questions rudely.
He also stated that CP snatched the phone from the hand of the complainant and that he threatened both of them. After the incident SG accompanied the applicant to the forensic medicine service because the latters left hand hurt. . On August the prosecutors office interviewed the applicant who repeated his version of the facts. . On August the prosecutors office heard him on and claimed that he only shook his hand at the beginning of the meeting as a sign of greeting. He also confirmed that he had an animated discussion with the applicant but that he used correct language unlike the applicant. He blocked his access to the door to convince him to.
The two complaints were submitted to the Prosecutors Office Country Email List attached to the Constana Court of Appeal the prosecutors office which on July decided to connect them. . On August the applicant gave a statement to the police he repeated his version of events. . On August SG gave in turn a statement to the police. He stated that CPs attitude was unpleasant that he prevented him from leaving the office and that he insisted that he sign a series of documents and that he answered the complainants questions rudely.
He also stated that CP snatched the phone from the hand of the complainant and that he threatened both of them. After the incident SG accompanied the applicant to the forensic medicine service because the latters left hand hurt. . On August the prosecutors office interviewed the applicant who repeated his version of the facts. . On August the prosecutors office heard him on and claimed that he only shook his hand at the beginning of the meeting as a sign of greeting. He also confirmed that he had an animated discussion with the applicant but that he used correct language unlike the applicant. He blocked his access to the door to convince him to.